Skip to content
Volunteers organizing donations using tablet
Compare

Clyr vs Stampli: AP Specialist or the Whole Spend Cycle?

Stampli is a focused AP automation product: invoices captured, coded with its Billy AI, routed for approval, and paid, with strong construction ERP integrations. What it centers, the invoice, is also its boundary: card spend, field receipts, reimbursements, utilities, and job-level cost control live outside it. Clyr runs AP and everything else in one system: invoice automation plus live card feeds, receipts by text, real-time job costing, utility bill retrieval, and 1099s. Choose Stampli if invoice volume on an enterprise construction ERP is your entire problem. Choose Clyr if invoices are only half of how your money leaves the building.

Book a free demo Jump to the comparison
At a glance

Clyr vs Stampli at a glance

Clyr
Stampli
Category
Full spend platform: AP + cards + field capture
AP automation specialist
Invoice automation
Yes: capture, AI coding, approvals, payment
Yes; the core product, with Billy AI
PO matching
Yes
Yes
Card expense management
Yes, on your existing cards, capture by text
No; invoices only
Reimbursements and mileage
Yes
No
Utility bill retrieval
Yes: daily portal fetch, unit matching, variance alerts
No
Job costing
Real-time budget vs. actual across cards + bills
Invoice coding to jobs via ERP; no live cost view across spend
ERP and accounting
QuickBooks, Xero, Sage Intacct, NetSuite
Deep, incl. construction ERPs: FOUNDATION, Vista, Sage 300 CRE
Field platform sync
Jobber, Service Fusion, Buildium, Hostaway, Hosthub, Connecteam
Not the focus
Best fit
Field companies unifying all spend
High invoice volume on enterprise construction ERPs
No spin

The honest version of this comparison

Stampli is good at AP. Its construction story is real: named integrations with FOUNDATION, Vista by Viewpoint, Sage 300 CRE, and Sage Intacct Construction, and documented cases of large invoice-cycle reductions. A general contractor processing thousands of invoices a month on Vista should have Stampli on the shortlist, and this page will not pretend otherwise.

The question for most field companies is different: what fraction of your spend arrives as an invoice? The truck card at the supply house, the tech's fuel stop, the reimbursement for a parts run, the utility bill for the shop: none of it is an invoice, and none of it enters Stampli. Companies that pick an AP specialist end up buying a second product for cards and receipts, then reconciling job costs across both. Clyr's argument is one system: every dollar, invoice or swipe, captured, coded to its job, and visible in one budget vs. actual view.

Head to head

Where each platform is strong

Invoice processing at volume. Stampli's dedicated focus shows in its approval collaboration and its Billy AI coding. Clyr automates the same cycle, capture, coding, approvals, payment by ACH, check, or card, PO matching, inside the broader platform.

Everything that is not an invoice. Card spend captured by text at the swipe, no-login receipt links for crews, reimbursements with mileage, utility bills fetched from provider portals with variance alerts, 1099 e-filing. This is Clyr's half of the field, and Stampli does not play on it.

Job-level truth. Stampli codes invoices to jobs through the ERP. Clyr shows live budget vs. actual per job across all spend types, which is the number an owner actually asks for mid-project.

Enterprise construction ERPs. Stampli's FOUNDATION and Vista integrations are deeper than anything Clyr claims there. Companies committed to those ERPs at enterprise scale should weigh that seriously.

Pricing

Pricing model

Stampli is quote-based, typically scoped by invoice volume and modules. Clyr is usage-based and includes the card-expense side that would otherwise require a second subscription. Price the stack, not the product: AP specialist plus expense tool plus reconciliation time, versus one platform.

Who should choose Stampli

AP departments with heavy invoice volume on enterprise ERPs, especially construction firms on FOUNDATION, Vista, or Sage 300 CRE, whose card-spend problem is either small or already solved elsewhere.

Who should choose Clyr

Field companies where spend splits between invoices and cards: contractors, property managers, service businesses. Teams that want one approval framework, one coding engine, and one job-cost view across everything, without buying and stitching two products.

Migration

Switching from Stampli to Clyr

Vendor records and open bills migrate via your accounting sync; approval rules rebuild in Clyr's rule engine in an afternoon. The bigger change is additive: card spend and field receipts join the same system, so plan coding rules for both sides at once.

The wider field

Other Stampli alternatives worth considering

AvidXchange

enterprise AP network for real estate portfolios. See Clyr vs AvidXchange.

BILL

the broader BILL AP platform. See Clyr vs Divvy for the spend side.

Ramp

strong AP inside a card-first platform. See Clyr vs Ramp.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Is Clyr a good alternative to Stampli?

Yes, when the goal is automating all spend rather than invoices alone. Clyr matches the AP cycle and adds card capture, reimbursements, utilities, and live job costing in the same system.

Does Clyr automate invoice processing like Stampli?

Yes: invoices are captured, AI-coded, routed by approval rules, matched to POs, and paid by ACH, check, or card, with a full audit trail.

Can Stampli handle employee card expenses?

No; Stampli is invoice-focused. Card spend requires a separate product, which is precisely the gap Clyr closes.

Does Clyr work for property management AP?

Yes, including the part nobody else automates: utility bills retrieved daily from provider portals, matched to properties and units, with variance alerts, and synced to your PMS.

We run a construction ERP like Vista. Which fits better?

At enterprise invoice volume on Vista or FOUNDATION, Stampli's integrations are a real advantage. On QuickBooks, Sage Intacct, or NetSuite, with meaningful card spend in the field, Clyr's one-platform model usually wins the total math.

How long does Clyr take to deploy?

About 15 minutes of admin setup, with approval rules and coding rules configured against your existing chart of accounts; field staff onboard by text.

Keep exploring
Avidxchange Alternative Ramp Alternative All comparisons
Get a demo

See it on your own spend

Count how much of last month left by card instead of invoice, then book a 20-minute demo and see both halves in one system.

Book a free demo Already a customer? Log in